In the United States the public is involved in a deeply impassioned and important dialogue about weaknesses in our system of justice. Within the last two years a number of young black men have been killed in confrontations with officers from their own local police departments.
In all of these situations the public has perceived that unnecessary, excessive force and a rush to very bad judgment was used by police in situations that resulted in the death of unarmed and possibly innocent young men. In two of these cases the local prosecutor’s offices refused to indict the police officers of any kind of a crime. In one case the coroner ruled that the young man’s death was clearly a homicide.
The angry demonstrators in our streets are demanding that our justice system take stock of itself, and refer back to the American Dream: that Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness are our birthright. It would seem that these young men were denied this dream, certainly in their death and probably from their birth.
About four years ago a series of animated cartoons flooded the Internet amusing all who saw them by their irreverent and frankly alarming exposure of what really goes on inside a small local police department. They exposed the soft underbelly of small-town police culture. The YouTube cartoons were (probably) produced by a member of the Renton Police Department who found this interesting way to the hypocrisies, conflicts of interest, self-serving behaviors, and downright illegal habits that he found as commonplace inside his own work environment. At the time the cartoon animations struck us as profoundly important: the anonymity that the Internet provided this police officer allowed him to speak absolutely fearlessly, without the risk of internal retribution from those he was embarrassing. The viewer gets a fly on the wall account of what really goes on inside a small police department.
The incident opened a Pandora’s box of questions:
- Were the animations – though they named no individuals and no police force – a form of cyberstalking? Renton’s chief of police and city prosecutor thought so. https://cei.org/op-eds-articles/mrfuddlesticks-renton-police-department-and-online-civil-liberties
- Were the animators covered under First Amendment freedom-of-speech protection? The ACLU thought so. http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2011/08/04/aclu-wants-to-find-cartoonist-under-investigation-by-renton-police
- And did the incident usher in an Internet-buffered, repercussions-free form of whistle blowing by means of easily accessible easy-to-use freeware animation?
Maybe and maybe not.
Xtranormal, the company whose software was used to create the Renton animations is no longer active, though other freeware is out there. http://goanimate.com/video-maker-tips/saying-goodbye-to-xtranormal/
After being reportedly outed by YouTube and Google, two policemen involved in one of the animations were demoted. http://www.rentonreporter.com/news/127473778.html
We’re presenting a link back to these Renton police animated videos because we think they provide important insights for those people who are demanding a fundamental sea-change in the relationship between our communities, our police departments, and our system of justice in the United States.
We hope you will find these animated cartoons as amusing and as informative as we did.
Executive Director CRNI